quelle


 05 Sep 2009 @ 10:32 AM 
 

Point Illustrated

 

You are unlikely to see a strong reaction from the Marines on the publication of a the photograph of a mortally wounded LCpl Bernard. There are a number of reasons for that, I think. I must add first that I am surprised that they are not upset that the family of one of their fallen was totally disregarded in this action. I always thought that the Marines were family, and that the family of their family was, well, family. They are probably going to remain out of the fray, though. One of those reasons is that they don’t have to.

Plenty of others will raise a cry and hue for them. My initial reaction was powerful and gut-level; but then it’s time to look at the reaction and the reasoning behind it. First, the disregard for the family’s well-known wishes was disregarded. It was weighed against the standards that the AP finds important and, in the end, found less compelling than their business interests. Cold? Indeed; but there was a reason that the approval was first sought. The AP was seeking validation from the family. The AP never really cared if the response was negative. This means that the approval of the family would have added some value to the AP’s angle on this; but they were so willing to go without approval that they were willing to disregard a direct request from the Secretary of Defense, who asked them not to publish it.

They weren’t willing to take a “no,” but there was a reason that they wanted the validation of the “yes.”

While it could be claimed that we have abrogated our own rights to privacy simply by raising our hands, why do we sign press release authorizations… or not… when we do our processing to go to a combat theater? While that release is not intended for such situations, if we’ve abrogated our rights, then why do they need a release? The Dover policy is all about the right of privacy that is recognized for families. We volunteered for service in a time of war. There is not a single one of us who were drafted into the military. In return, we expect to be given some consideration. There are reasons why we feel that we need it.

These reasons were illustrated by the Huffington Post, who blew the picture up all over their home page. The HuffPo doesn’t care a bit about the tragedy of sacrifice in war; they want web traffic. It is their be all and end all; and they will get it. If you feel the spirit move you, by all means look… but I would prefer that you didn’t. It is harlotry, pure and simple. We should put up a sign: Please Do Not Feed the Whores. While driven by prurience, greed and general sluttiness, the HuffPo is also significantly slanted politically; no friend of Soldiers or Marines; unless you happen to be mortally wounded and therefore useful to the crowd that HuffPo caters to. Then you are to be blown up to gigantic proportions and your death agonies exulted over by those who hate you for who you are and what you died for.

And they have been. LCpl Bernard has been exulted over in his death agonies, something that many of us know would happen to us if our mortally wounded images were displayed. We didn’t join and risk being mortally wounded just so some schmuck could use the image of our sacrifice against what we believe in. We’re not claiming impunity against being photographed or filmed in the conduct of our duties. Hey, if you catch us doing something wrong, then show it. Good, bad or indifferent… show it.

Of course, there is a tremendous amount of good that goes on here, too. Damned little of that get shown, either. This war is not exactly the triumph of journalism. Journalism as it was once known is actually quite dead. Most of the journalists stay in Kabul and send out stringers. The same happened in Iraq. There is not a lot of journalism being practiced, and then a photographer gets “the money shot.” The AP, or pretty much any legacy media outlet is going to use it. They will take the hits on their websites and the gory horror of death selling papers for them. And the HuffPo’s of the world will blow up a young American’s death throes so that all those who oppose what the young man was doing can cry out with glee and babble on about how he deserved to die. This is heinous, and it is anathema to those of us who risk all to do this job. Now we risk not only our lives and ultimate pain for our families, but we risk disrespect from our own countrymen, who when media was more limited would never be tolerated exulting over the death of a Marine. But media is cheap now; so are a lot of the outlets.

Death is a private moment. It is also tremendously painful for our families. LCpl Bernard’s parents could have lived the rest of their lives without seeing that photograph. Not only have they seen it, they have lived to see their son’s death greeted with glee by some of their fellow citizens.

Our country is breaking faith with us… and that’s the point of the exultation. By dragging this young Marine through the streets of virtual Mogadishu, the Somalians of HuffPo and their exulting netskinnies are breaking faith with the military and they are doing it purposefully. LCpl Bernard never did a thing to deserve that. He deserves respect and gratitude. His parents, whose son lies forfeit on the altar of liberty, are subjected to his being dragged triumphantly about the internet by clannish internet warlords.

Nice.

We are volunteers all. We deserve to be treated with respect or, failing that, we refuse to be disrespected. We cannot accept this type of abuse again. We need to demand that our leadership put safeguards in place to prevent this and protect us when we have been rendered vulnerable due to wounds. Losing our lives is one thing; having it rubbed in the faces of our wives, parents, or in my case, children is not something that we should ever have to worry about. We should call on Secretary Gates to review the policies. There is room for give and take. He gave them Dover; give us now our dignity. People who we capture are given more dignity than we are while our own citizens can virtually dance on our suffering and dying bodies.

I would recommend a policy that, like Dover, any images of an American servicemember that involves loss of life, limb or eyesight should require approval of the servicemember or in the case of death or incapacitation, a designated family member. The world has changed. In a digital world we have the ability to ask each and every time; and it should be done. The rights of each end where the rights of others begin; that includes the press. They obviously cannot be expected to hold themselves to any ethical standard.

Or is respect for our service only lip service itself, sold cheaply to the nearest harlot upon demand?

It’s time to start flooding Secretary Gates’ office with demands for such protection from the Virtual Vultures of Mogadishu.

Tags Categories: Uncategorized Posted By: Old Blue
Last Edit: 05 Sep 2009 @ 10 32 AM

EmailPermalink
 

Responses to this post » (14 Total)

 
  1. Ky Woman says:

    Blue,
    Yet again, your words prove your ability to be a voice of reason or a voice of indignant rage.

    I concur with your above statement…All those in agreement say “Aye”.

    LFS~

  2. Hagenmary says:

    AYE. Big TIme AYE.
    I haven’t seen the picture, and I’ll go out of my way NEVER to see it. In that way, I can give that Marine and his family the respect and dignity that was denied by the AP.

  3. Marian White says:

    Aye

  4. coffeypot says:

    I know of no person who is not totally behind you and yours. But then the South has always been patriotic. Yes, journalism is dead. The job has been turned over to jackals who only strive for the truth of the all mighty dollar. Truthfully, these ‘journalist’ are living testimony to the caliber of soldiers serving our country. Just the fact that they are still alive or not recovering from sever wounds, cuts and burses that could be wrought by our men and women in uniform show the caliber of men and women we have serving. I would frag the bitch.

  5. Due to my work rotation I am only now discovering this outrage. I’m somewhat glad that I won’t be around when all the former and current members of the military who work with me and for me find out about this contemptible act.

    I served eight years in the military – during peacetime. Thanks to you and your family for your service and sacrifice.

  6. steve says:

    I think you are probably correct here, but this is one I have puzzled over for a while. For those who have never served or have no family serving, war as shown on TV looks like a video game, only with less blood. We have even avoided the sight of coffins. All we have are names and numbers. It makes it much easier to supportive of a war effort if no one is “really” being hurt, really for most people meaning they never see it.

    Still, on balance I guess we should put families first. I remember writing that just in case letter before I was deployed. I am glad my wife never had to open it and would have liked for her feelings to be spared as much as possible.

    Steve

  7. elf says:

    Gates response should be to yank Dover, and deny AP embeds.

    Yes, I know that’s a lot of reporters. Tough shite.

    Never happen of course. Not with this WH. The press is a major constitiuentency. Let’s see Gates do something other than beg, then protest afterwards in futility?

    Sorry to the principled Dems, but this is the Left running wild, cuz now it’s “their turn”.

    Vietnam levels of disrespect must NOT happen again. If someone spits on you, spit back. Then hit em. Hard.

    Grrrr…..

  8. Sanmon says:

    Now we hear from LWJ that another NYT has been kidnaped. I saw no outrage from NYT or any other paper or news media outlet regarding this putrid reporting on LCpl Bernard just the opposite. I do not know how the honor of our great military personnel will come into play into looking for this reporter. I do know that I would have a hard time helping the NYT in the search of their missing man.

  9. OldSoldier54 says:

    ” …Then hit em. …”

    Roger that, elf. The time for being nice is over.

  10. David M says:

    The Thunder Run has linked to this post in the blog post From the Front: 09/05/2009 News and Personal dispatches from the front and the home front.

  11. brat says:

    Agree absolutely with you, Blue and also with elf….

    ‘Nuff said from me.

    Thank you.

  12. [...] blog “Afghan Quest” reacts to the publication of LCpl’s photograph by saying “The AP never really cared if [...]

  13. Whores is a good name for them. They have the ethics of a starving piranha.

  14. Glenn Woodbury says:

    Hmmm. Retired Coastie here. To the left of Karl Marx and to the right of Ghengis Khan, depending on subject. Governments in general, and the U.S. gov’t has _never_ been an exception, have historically screwed over soldiers. They need the military to correct their political mistakes, foreign or domestic. When they’re done, they discard us.
    Wake up. They ended the draft to avoid the spectre of the rather self-interested college students protesting wars in which they might die. So, my fellow volunteers, at what point do we walk away? When we don’t believe in the cause? Afghanistan might be a good cause. Do we walk when our government, fellow citizens and press don’t treat us with respect? Why don’t they treat us with respect? Most U.S. citizens have never been in the service, any service. The whole subject of service, the military and war is hypothetical to them. It’s all just another TV show, now available on You-Tube.
    In the end, it’s what we believe in that matters; whether we agree with one another or not. As individuals, our actions can only be based on our values, and what we hold dear. This is important. And we need to be very careful about who forms these values, and that they are true, and not sold to us for sordid motives.

    Glenn

Post a Comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

\/ More Options ...
Change Theme...
  • Users » 1
  • Posts/Pages » 306
  • Comments » 1,707
  • comprar viagra Heidelberg
    figurings Burlington buy viagra online buy viagra online beagles De Hert Paul, Gutwirth Serge (2003) Making sense of privacy and data protection. A prospective overview in the light of the future of identity, location based services and the virtual residence. Security and Privacy for the Citizen in the Post-September 11 Digital Age. Oysters are normally held in mesh bags attached to trestles. These are covered for most of the tidal cycle, being exposed at low water. Conditions adjacent to and beneath these trestles can vary with soft sediment and drifting plant accumulations. Birds do not appear to be impacted by the presence of oyster farms but are disturbed when these are tended. These are multiple choice assessments with one correct answer. Clicking on an answer will bring you to another page. If your answer is correct, then it is acknowledged with a short explanation. Please read the explanation carefully and proceed to the next assessment as prompted at the bottom of the page. Prior radical prostatectomy series have stendra online shown an inverse association between prostate size and high grade cancer. It has been suggested that smaller size prostates arise in a low androgen environment, enabling development of more aggressive cancer. We propose that this observation is the result of ascertainment bias driven by prostate specific antigen performance. If a figure has been published, acknowledge the original source and submit written permission from the copyright holder to reproduce the material. Permission is required, irrespective of authorship or publisher, except for documents in the public domain. Titles and detailed explanations belong in the legends for figures, not on the figures themselves. Consistency in size within the article is strongly preferred. Any special instructions regarding sizing should be clearly noted..
Change Theme...
  • VoidVoid « Default
  • LifeLife
  • EarthEarth
  • WindWind
  • WaterWater
  • FireFire
  • LightLight

About Blue



    No Child Pages.
custom essay writing service buyanessaysonline.com